It is heartbreaking’: how thirty captive beluga whales are now bargaining chips in dispute over animal cruelty.
The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.
Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a closed attraction, public officials and animal rights activists.
But those closest to the whales say the intense discussion over their destiny often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the humans who interact with them daily.
After the Canadian government prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the federal government pays for the expense of their care. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Researchers say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and communal behavior suggest they are deeply intelligent animals – something Kristy Burgess learned first-hand.
She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a role that involved earning the trust of the aquatic animals.
“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a special affection for two female belugas with contrasting temperaments.
“Eve accepted me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “They transformed the way I view relationships.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a number which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The park did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The park did not respond to a request for comment, but earlier asserted: “The whales … get far better medical attention and constant care than any human in the Britain, or other places.”
Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was fired from the facility in the spring following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the park suspected details of the death were leaked to the press and she was released not long after.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s warning to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to put down even a individual beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and heavy equipment.
“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess supports requests for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a proposal to send the whales to China.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a ongoing situation in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As the public, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing approve an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”
But Burgess said the official’s statements reveal a broader misunderstanding of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion
As authorities work to find a answer, ideas have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of food for Inuit communities.
A suggested protected area in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received official endorsement, has shown to be contentious. The future location, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could in time represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Some experts say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a viable approach in the short term.
The project lead, director of the plan, said the location will mimic the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|